Nonfarm Payrolls Review, JOLTs Preview
"Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
The world is a complex place and we certainly recognize the degree of unknowns that are embedded in our daily lives. Despite awareness about the things we inevitable can't know, we try to simplify and appreciate the fact that the world can only end once. Markets run in cycles to varying degrees, no more, no less.
Last week, I wrote about about Jackson Hole and the Fed's view that "clear progress" was seen in the labor market; on the back of only 235k jobs added to the payroll in August, has the labor market turned a little murkier?
The true shape of the labor market will be known when workers, who have received federal unemployment benefits, will have to go back to work and fill some of the 10 million open jobs out there.
It is not a secret that businesses will accelerate the adoption of technology, replace workers, and replace office space with a digital HQ. According to Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, the currently 15% of office workers back in a physical office space will reach somewhere close to 40% after we have returned to "normalcy".
These are unquestionably stunning numbers and it will challenge the corporate culture on many levels; ultimately, it's hard to see technology not succeed in yet another need that's to be filled by the acumen of new and established entrepreneurs.
As much as we keep a pulse on new trends in venture capital, though, we are a macro-focused shop where we combine a bottoms-up fundamental approach with technicals.
Before diving into details on Nonfarm and JOLTs, we wanted to share some graphs and maps showcasing the change of habits and behaviors.
The clear trend towards remote work has led to a shift in construction spending from commercial to residential housing as we've highlighted in our August 22, 2021 edition.
Office as a mindset, not a physical location will challenge corporate cultures and reward those, who can connect remote workers. One of the most notable trends is the push into the metaverse (a digital space for social and professional interactions.)
Creative disruption is a relatively shallow term for what means long-term unemployment and transition into different areas for many.
Similar to "transitory", maximum employment is a very fragile term, which will be monitored from one jobs report to the next.
As a good deal of Fed governors have stated their willingness to taper after another one or two strong job reports on the back of July's, 235k jobs added in August are not boding well for a September taper announcement.
Especially noteworthy is the slowdown in the services sector, which the Fed has been the most focused on. With unemployment at 5.2% - in the Fed's terms, the rate is overstating the extent of the jobs recovery, - and MoM wage gains holding firm at 0.6%, are we set to run into a wage-price spiral that Jay Powell noted as undesirable in his Jackson Hole speech?
As much as we want to give everyone a chance to make a living with a job that fulfills the psychological needs of the individual, aggressive monetary and fiscal policies in the pursuit of maximum employment are a slippery slope. At the point where policy makers anticipate more fiscal space - the degree to which the market can absorb treasury supply at low rates, - than is actually present, social problem solving without addressing the root causes can get dangerous.
The Fed has acknowledged those risks and stated its unwillingness to repeat the mistakes of the 1970s. Nevertheless, the committee has maintained a dovish tone and is putting itself into a corner where weak economic data triggers an instant change of course or at least expectations thereof. One interview worth watching is Judy Shelton's appearance on CNBC:
We won't miss the forest for the trees and monitor economic data and market signals in their entirety. It is likely that discontinued federal unemployment benefits will cause more workers to return, but will it be enough for policy to become less accommodative and are businesses willing to employ more manual labor at higher wages?
Defining the level of maximum employment has been tricky pre-pandemic, and distortions in the current data have made a challenging question even more difficult. Talking about distortions, the New York Fed just suspended its GDP Nowcast due to the uncertainty surrounding economic data.
While the Fed believes that premature tightening could lead to a more stringent environment when it's not needed, have they adequately assessed what could be ripple effects of easy money?
We have gone through the CPI's shelter component and pointed to the fact that more sticky inflation components will be up against cooler/transitory factors. There is always a time and place for things; the same way the Fed adopted highly favorable measures for risk assets during the height of the pandemic, central banks have a window to revert to a more normal set of tools in order to retain their ability to backstop markets in the event of another downturn.
There's arguably been a lot of discussion around the Fed's ability to deliver even more when everyone thought they had used up all their firepower -- it is impossible to define sustainability of policy in the context of unprecedented events, so it is our job to remain vigilant towards potential outcomes.
Nonfarm Payrolls recap:
Lackluster August jobs report with 235k jobs added
Service sector slowdown
Federal unemployment benefits that will expire are set to bring more people into the labor force (is it enough?)
Consistent wage inflation as businesses struggle to fill positions
Will that lead to a change of action and increased adoption of technology?
Most Fed governors wanted to see another 1-2 strong job reports after July's before tapering (we didn't get that with August's)
Fiscal and monetary policy are well-intended but appear to be addressing issues that are hard to solve by policy makers
Nonfarm Revisions for prior months
July: +110k from +943k to +1.053m
June: +24k from +938k to +962k
On Wednesday at 9:00 am CT, we will get the July JOLTs Job Openings read:
Exp. 9.281M (prev. 10.073M)